- Original article
- Open Access
Assessment and documentation among physical therapists in Egypt
Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy volume 21, pages 32–41 (2016)
Standardized assessment is a legal and ethical professional requirement in clinical decision-making. Clinical guidelines emphasize the importance of clinical assessment and documentation to foster the implementation of evidence-based management and reduce unnecessary therapeutic costs. In developing countries like Egypt, healthcare may be suboptimal and is challenged by low budget and malpractices. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the association between assessment and documentation of physical therapy and Egyptian physical therapists’ demographics. In addition, therapists’ attitude toward the use of electronic medical record was also evaluated.
Materials and methods
An online and a paper-based survey was developed and tested for linguistic clarity before it was administrated to physical therapists.
A total of 389 questionnaires were used for statistical analyses. The majority of the respondents (84.1%) always or often assessed their patients; however, almost half of them (44.7%) rarely or never used the assessment tools. Seventy-eight percent of the respondents always or often documented their examination findings. Electronic medical records were rarely or never used by 42.7% of the respondents, although almost all of them expressed their willingness to use them if they were available for free. More experienced male therapists with higher academic degrees were significantly but weakly associated with more frequent patient assessment (P<0.05). Furthermore, male junior therapists used assessment tools more frequently (P<0.05). None of the demographic variables was associated with documentation (P>0.05). For practice type, respondents worked at various clinical settings. No association between the type of practice and assessment or documentation was found (P>0.05).
The majority of Egyptian physical therapists assess patients informally without the use of standard tools. Although patients’ findings are documented, the use of electronic meical records is rare.
Swinkels ICS, van den Ende CHM, van den Bosch W, Dekker J, Wimmers RH. Physiotherapy management of low back pain: does practice match the Dutch guidelines?. Aust J Physiother 2005; 51:35–41.
Rothstein JM, Campbell SK, Echternach JL, Jette AM, Knecht HG, Rose SJ. Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice. Phys Ther 1991; 71:589–622.
World Confederation for Physical Therapy. WCPT guideline for standards of physical therapy practice. London: World Confederation for Physical Therapy, Victoria Charity Centre; 2011. Available at: http://www.wcpt.org/sites/wcpt.org/files/files/Guideline_standards_practice_complete.pdf. Accessed on: September 7, 2015.
Monkeysurvey; 2016. Available at: http://www.monkeysurvey.com. Accessed from August 2015 to January 2016 (continuous).
Raosoft sample size calculator; 2004. Available at: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html. Accessed 05 August 2015.
Colon VF. 10 ways to reduce medical malpractice exposure. Physician Exec 2002; 28:16–18.
Teichman P. Documentation tips for reducing malpractice risk. Fam Pr Manag 2000; 7:29–33.
Agarwal R, Kalita J, Misra UK. Barriers to evidence-based medicine practice in South Asia and possible solutions. Neurol Asia 2008; 13:87–94.
Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Phillips S et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33:273–278.
Chesson R, Macleod M, Massie S. Outcome measures used in therapy departments in Scotland. Physiotherapy 1996; 82:673–679.
Russek L, Wooden M, Ekedahl S, Bush A. Attitudes toward standardized data collection. Phys Ther 1997; 77:714–729.
Swinkels R, van Peppen RPS, Wittink H, Custers JWH, Beurskens AJHM. Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12:106.
Stevens JGA, Beurskens AJMH. Implementation of measurement instruments in physical therapist practice: development of a tailored strategy. Phys Ther 2010; 90:953–961.
Moncur C. Physical therapy competencies in rheumatology. Phys Ther 1985; 65:1365–1372.
Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, Harcourt P, Zylinski M, Clancy J et al. Promoting the use of measurement tools in practice: a mixed-methods study of the activities and experiences of physical therapist knowledge brokers. Phys Ther 2008; 90:191–206.
Johanson MA. Sex differences in career expectations of physical therapist students. Phys Ther 2007; 87:1199–1211.
Donn SM. Medical liability, risk management, and the quality of health care. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10:3–9.
Sandstrom R. Malpractice by physical therapists: descriptive analysis of reports in the National Practitioner Data Bank public use data file, 1991-2004. J Allied Health 2007; 36:201–208.
Kolber M, Lucado AM. Risk management strategies in physical therapy: documentation to avoid malpractice. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2005; 18:123–130.
Duncan EAS, Murray J. The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12:96.
Van der Wees PJ, Jamtvedt G, Rebbeck T, de Bie RA, Dekker J, Hendriks EJM. Multifaceted strategies may increase implementation of physiotherapy clinical guidelines: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2008; 54:233–241.
Ketelaar M, Russell DJ, Gorter JW. The challenge of moving evidence-based measures into clinical practice: lessons in knowledge translation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2008; 28:191–206.
Salbach NM, Veinot P, Jaglal SB, Bayley M, Rolfe D. From continuing education to personal digital assistants: what do physical therapists need to support evidence-based practice in stroke management?. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17:786–793.
Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, Harcourt P, Zylinski M, Clancy J. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther 2006; 11:46–53.
Copeland JM, Taylor WJ, Dean SG. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: a survey of New Zealand physical therapists. Phys Ther 2008; 88:1492–1505.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work noncommercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
About this article
Cite this article
Youssef, A.R., Bakry, M.G. Assessment and documentation among physical therapists in Egypt. Bull Fac Phys Ther 21, 32–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-6611.188024
- physical therapy