Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Published:

Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field on pain and nerve conduction velocity in patients with diabetic neuropathy

Abstract

Background

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is one of the most common and disabling complication of diabetes mellitus.

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Settings and design

A total of 30 patients with diabetic neuropathy from both sexes were selected from the Outpatient Clinic of Diabetes Mellitus, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, with age ranging from 40 to 50 years. They were divided into two equal groups: PEMF group (group A) and control group (group B).

Materials and methods

Group A received PEMF with frequency of 50Hz and intensity of 20 G in addition to traditional physical therapy program. Group B received traditional physical therapy program only. The treatment program was conducted three times per week for 4 weeks. Measurements of pain intensity by visual analog scale and peroneal nerve conduction velocity by computerized electromyography device were done before and after treatment.

Results

Results revealed that there was a significant reduction of pain intensity and significant improvement of peroneal nerve conduction velocity (m/s) in both groups (P<0.05), with slightly in favor of group A.

Conclusion

It could be concluded that PEMF combined with traditional physical therapy program has a positive effect on diabetic neuropathy symptoms.

References

  1. Boulton AJ, Vinik AI, Arezzo JC, Bril V, Feldman EL, Freeman R, et al. Diabetic neuropathies a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:956–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards JL, Vincent AM, Cheng HT, Feldman EL. Diabetic neuropathy: mechanisms to management. Pharmacol Ther 2008; 120:1–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tesfaye S, Boulton AJ, Dyck PJ, Freeman R, Horowitz M, Kempler P, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments. Diabetes Care 2010; 33:2285–2293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin CL, Albers J, Herman WH, Cleary P, Waberski B, Greene DA, et al. Neuropathy among the diabetes control and complications trial cohort 8 years after trial completion. Diabetes Care 2006; 29:340–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rondon L, Privat AM, Daulhac L, Davin N, Mazur A, Fialip J, et al. Magnesium attenuates chronic hypersensitivity and spinal cord receptor phosphorylation in a rat model of diabetic neuropathic pain. J Physiol 2010; 588:4205–4215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vinay G, Sarika C, Sandhu J. Evaluation of the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field in the management of patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2009; 29:56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weintraub MI, Herrmann DN, Smith AG, Backonja MM, Cole SP. Pulsed electromagnetic fields to reduce diabetic neuropathic pain and stimulate neuronal repair: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90:1102–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beaulieu K, Beland P, Pinard M, Handfield G, Handfield N, Goffaux P, et al. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on experimental pain: a double-blind, randomized study in healthy young adults. Electromagn Biol Med 2016; 35:237–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelleher M, Al-Abri R, Lenihan D, Glasby M. Use of a static magnetic field to promote recovery after peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosurg 2006; 105:610–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frahm J, Lantow M, Lupke M, Weiss DG, Simkó M. Alteration in cellular functions in mouse macrophages after exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 2006; 99:168–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Haik M, Alburquerque-Sendín F, Moreira R, Pires E, Camargo P. Effectiveness of physical therapy treatment of clearly defined subacromial pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50:1124–1134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Almadrones L, Calhoun EA, Cella D. Tools for grading neuropathy scale, description of tools. Italy: The National Cancer Institute’s; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mirkovic VB, Banjac L, Dasic Z, Dapcevic M. Non-pharmacological treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy by pulse electromagnetic field. Healthmed 2012; 6:1291–1295.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldsmith JR, Lidtke RH, Shott S. The effects of range-of-motion therapy on the plantar pressures of patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002; 92:483–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boulton AJ. Management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clin Diabetes 2005; 23:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abbott CA, Malik RA, van Ross ER, Kulkarni J, Boulton AJ. Prevalence and characteristics of painful diabetic neuropathy in a large community-based diabetic population in the UK. Diabetes Care 2011; 34:2220–2224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Callaghan BC, Cheng HT, Stables CL, Smith AL, Feldman EL. Diabetic neuropathy: clinical manifestations and current treatments. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11:521–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim S, Im W-S, Kang L, Lee S-T, Chu K, Kim BI. The application of magnets directs the orientation of neurite outgrowth in cultured human neuronal cells. J Neurosci Methods 2008; 174:91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lei T, Jing D, Xie K, Jiang M, Li F, Cai J, et al. Therapeutic effects of 15 Hz pulsed electromagnetic field on diabetic peripheral neuropathy in streptozotocin-treated rats. PloS One 2013; 8:614–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Musaev A, Guseinova S, Imamverdieva S. The use of pulsed electromagnetic fields with complex modulation in the treatment of patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. Neurosci Behav Physiol 2003; 33:745–752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Morki B, Sinaki M. Painful disorders of the spine and back pain syndromes. In: Sinaki M, editor. Basic clinical rehabilitation medicine. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mobsy; 1993. 489–502.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jari PA, Taru V, Markkuk K, Olavi A. Activation at lumbar paraspinal and abdominal muscles during therapeutic exercises in chronic low back pain patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85:823–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Nguyen JP, Marks R. Pulsed electromagnetic fields for treating osteoarthritis. Physiotherapy 2002; 88:458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Magnusson ML, Bishop JB, Hasselquist L, Spratt KF. Range of motion and motion pattern in patient with low back pain before and after rehabilitation. Spine 1998; 23:2631–2639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chebotar’ova L, Chebotar’ov H. Use of low-power electromagnetic therapy in diabetic polyneuropathy. Fiziol Zh 2002; 49:85–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kadrya Battecha Doctoral degree.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work noncommercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Battecha, K. Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field on pain and nerve conduction velocity in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Bull Fac Phys Ther 22, 9–14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-6611.209877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-6611.209877

Keywords