Skip to main content

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Egyptian physical therapists



Physical therapists (PTs) are frequently exposed to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). There is limited evidence on the prevalence of these injuries and their potential risk factors in Egyptian PTs. This study aimed at estimating the prevalence of WMSDs among Egyptian PTs as well as potential risk factors and therapists’ coping strategies. Further, it investigated the association between WMSDs and socioeconomic factors.


Three hundred eighty-five eligible participants completed a survey. The prevalence of WMSDs was 99.5%. The five top affected anatomic regions were lower back (69.1%), neck (65.7%), shoulder (47.7%), wrist/hand (39.1%), and upper back (37.0%). Therapists rated awkward positions and handling of heavy patients as the most common predisposing factors for sustaining injuries. Regarding coping strategies, seeking informal help from peers to treat injuries-related symptoms and changing the posture of therapists and patients while working were mostly used by PTs. Overall, female therapists had higher injury prevalence than males (Cramer’s V < 0.5, p ≤ 0.05); except for upper back (p > 0.05). Education and working in multiple facilities simultaneously (public and private clinics) correlated significantly to sustaining injuries in the upper back (V = 0.14, p = 0.049 and V = 0.178, p = 0.002, respectively) and neck (V = 0.16, p = .019 and V = 0.142, p = 0.020, respectively). WMSDs were not associated with therapists’ experience or specialty (p > 0.05).


WMSDs injuries in PTs are prevalent in Egypt, especially in females, therapists with lower academic education, and those working in multiple facilities simultaneously.


Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are injuries or illnesses resulting from increased occupational demands and may adversely affect the neuromusculoskeletal system. These injuries may manifest as pain, soreness, impairment, and dysfunction secondary to damaged muscle, ligament, cartilage, or other connective tissues. The severity of these injuries range from mild (requiring a few days to recover) to severe injuries that may need specialized therapeutic intervention [1,2,3]. WMSDs have been linked to physical and mechanical [4], physiological [5], psychological [6,7,8], and occupational factors [9, 10]. Occupational injuries are prevalent among healthcare professionals [11,12,13]. Physical therapists (PTs) in specific are routinely exposed to work-related physically demanding tasks such as handling patients, applying manual techniques and assuming sustained improper positions, which may lead to the development of WMSDs [10, 14,15,16,17]. This subsequently may reduce therapists’ quality of life [17] and work productivity [11] as well as increase the economic cost associated with treating such injuries [9, 14, 18, 19]. The prevalence of WMSDs sustained by PTs worldwide ranges between 40 and 96% [10, 15, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. It is considerably high in developed western industrial countries such as the USA, Australia, and England (96%, 91% and 68%, respectively) [10, 14, 25]. This is also true for Asian countries such as Pakistan, Iran, and Kuwait in which injuries range between 56 and 94% [20, 22, 24].

As the etiology of WMSDs is multifactorial and may be influenced by the practice and infra-structures of different clinical settings in various countries, thus, identifying potential physical risk factors relevant to a particular setting (e.g., Egyptian health care system) could guide mechanistic research and help in developing effective prevention and treatment strategies [27]. This in turn is expected to reduce illness-related absenteeism, improving work productivity, and hence, reduce the socioeconomical burdens associated with WMSDs [17].

In a high-density population and low-resource country like Egypt, a few attempts were made to estimate the prevalence of WMSDs in PTs. Early last decade, in 2012, the prevalence of WMSDs in 62 Egyptian PTs was estimated to be 63.9%; however, this study was limited by the small sample size [28]. Further, participants’ eligibility criteria were not clear nor the language of the administrated questionnaire. Moreover, authors did not report gender-specific prevalence or the relationship between WMSDs and therapists’ education or working conditions.

Later in 2014, 400 Egyptian PTs were surveyed to estimate the prevalence of WMSDs, which was found to be 90.7% with handling a heavy caseload reported as a major risk factor [29]. However, this study surveyed PTs who reside only in the capital city Cairo, a governorate that may have a different lifestyle and working conditions compared to other locations. Further, this study did not report the coping responses to sustained injuries. A previous report also estimated that 84.9% of Egyptian pediatric PTS sustained WMSDs that affected their career plans; however, this survey was limited to one specialization in physiotherapy practice [30].

In 2019, 501 Egyptian PTs were surveyed to investigate the prevalence, profile, predictors, and response to WMSDs [31]. The current study was conducted at the same time and used a different set of questions based on the famous Nordic questionnaire combined with questions from the Cromie et al. [14]. Both questionnaires have been commonly used in different studies to estimate the prevalence of WMSDs [15, 23, 25]. The primary purpose of the current study was to estimate the prevalence of WMSDs among Egyptian PTs and to identify potential risk factors and coping responses. Further, this study investigated the association between WMSDs and therapists’ socio-demographic factors. Although the purpose and procedure of the current study are similar to that of Khairy et al. [31], yet a confirmation of WMSDs prevalence using a different set of questions will improve the understanding of the problem size in the Egyptian community, and hence, authorities would be encouraged to take appropriate preventive strategies. Further, the language of questionnaire administration in Khairy et al. [31] study was not stated.

In the current study, in order to ensure its linguistic clarity, the questionnaire was administrated in the Arabic language, the native language of the participants. Even though the target population received at least basic physiotherapy education in English language, yet language proficiency level may vary among PTs. Thus, we opted from using a full-length English questionnaire and used instead an Arabic language-translated version to reduce potential effects of language barrier on completing the questionnaire by PTs with various English proficiency level. This is in an agreement with the finding that reading in a native language can be done quicker than in a second language [32]. The Arabic translation of the Nordic questionnaire has been validated previously (Cronbach coefficient > 0.87) [33].


This is a cross-sectional survey study. The study was approved and conducted in accordance to the guidelines of the Ethics committee of the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt (P.T.REC/012/001699).

Recruitment method

Invitations were sent to Egyptian PTs with a standard message to motivate therapists to participate in the survey. Further, the survey was announced on relevant professional and recreational Facebook groups and pages. In addition, therapists from different governorates were contacted directly and were invited to participate.

Eligibility criteria

Male and female therapists were eligible to participate if they fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) graduated from an Egyptian university, (2) licensed to work in Egypt, and (3) have at least one year of experience. Participants were excluded if they were not currently practicing in Egypt, were non-Egyptians, or had an experience of less than one year after graduation.

Sample size calculation

The target population was PTs across Egypt. For sample size calculation, the population was assumed to be 20,000 therapists, as the sample size does not change much for larger populations. To achieve a 95% CI with a 5% margin of error and 50% response distribution, the current study required 377 therapists to represent the population ( However, the study enrolled 401 participants to compensate for disqualifying responses.

Survey sections

A self-administered online questionnaire was adopted from Standardized Nordic Questionnaire [34] to identify injury anatomic locations. Further, questions from Cromie et al. [14] were also used to inquire about the most common risk factors as well as strategies used by Egyptian PTs to cope with these injuries. The questionnaire included closed and open-ended questions and consisted of three sections: (1) an introduction to explain the study goals and survey structure as well as to obtain an informed consent from therapists willing to participate in the study to authorize the researchers to publish collected data; (2) questions about demographic information such as gender, years of experience, the highest educational degree completed, work setting, and specialty; and (3) questions about the anatomic distribution and severity of musculoskeletal injuries, potential risk factors, and coping responses to injuries, if present (Additional file 1).

The questionnaire was translated by two expert PTs fluent in both the Arabic and English languages, with at least 10 years of experience. Translation was guided by a previous Arabic translation of the Nordic questionnaire [33]. Translation consensus was done before the translated version was piloted on a sample of 20 PTs (with different levels of experience) prior to actual data collection to ensure its linguistic clarity and to resolve any ambiguity.

Data collection and statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to express the prevalence of WMSDs, risk factors, and coping responses in Egyptian PTs. Independent sample t test was performed to compare between the ages of male and female PTs, and Chi-square test was used to examine the association between the highest five prevalent WMSDs and demographic variables. When significant association was declared, Cramer’s V test was employed to assess the strength of association. All statistical analyses were done using the SPSS version 21 (IBM incorporation, IL, USA), with the significance level set at p ≤ 0.05.


This study received 401 responses. Sixteen responses were excluded (13 were filled out by non-Egyptian PTs and three responses due to incomplete basic information), to yield a total of 385 valid responses.

Participants’ demographics

The mean and standard deviation (SD) age of female therapists was 27.9 ± 4.8, and that of males was 29.4 ± 6.0 years. Males were significantly older than female therapists (p = 0.002). Participants’ experience level, academic education, and specialty as well as working facility are provided in Table 1 and Fig. 1.

Table 1 Participants' Demographics
Fig. 1

Different work settings of participants

Prevalence and characteristics of participants with WMSDs

Musculoskeletal disorders were experienced by 99.5% (n = 383) of the respondents, while only two participants (0.5%) were free from any disorder. Based on the anatomic location of disorders, all body regions were affected, with the top five prevalent anatomic regions being: (1) lower back (69.1%, n = 265), (2) neck (65.7%, n = 252), (3) shoulder (47.7%, n = 183), (4) wrist/hand (39.1%, n = 150), and (5) upper back (37%, n = 142) (Table 2). The symptoms described by participants and their severity are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3. Almost one quarter (19.5%) of the surveyed PTs considered a career shift to avoid pain.

Table 2 Distribution of WMSDs as reported by participants
Fig. 2

Symptoms of WMSDs in the study participants

Fig. 3

Severity of pain in study participant

Risk factors related to WMSDs

A list made of 15 different factors were included in the survey in order to assess the main three categories of routinely practiced risk factors in the daily working tasks in physical therapy [14]. Those categories were therapist-related, patient-related, and work-related factors (Table 3). Over 40% of the participants chose 8 risk factors for WMSDs. The most common therapist-related factors were working in awkward or stationary positions by 62.8% and 52.9% of the participants, respectively, continue working despite injury or pain by 54.2%, and employing faulty body mechanics by 50.9%. For patient-related factors, handling of heavy patients was stated by 62.3%. For working conditions, the lack of adequate rest between cases was selected by 40.5% (Table 3).

Table 3 Potential risk factors for WMSDs
Fig. 4

Prevalence of WMSDs in participating male and female therapists

Coping strategies and work impact

The participants were asked to reflect on the preferred reaction to pain or injuries sustained at work from a list of 10 different potential strategies (Table 4). The most commonly chosen coping approaches were seeking help of a peer therapist (51.9%) and adjusting patient’s or therapist’s body position (50.6%).

Table 4 Distribution of coping strategies used by Egyptian PTs

Association between WMSDs and socio-demographic factors

The total number of female therapists who suffered WMSDs was 207 (54.0%), whereas that of male therapists was 176 (45.9%). Female gender showed a weak significant association with injury in all 5 significant anatomic regions (V < 0.5, p ≤ 0.05) except upper back (p > 0.05) (Table 5, Fig. 4). There was no significant association between the years of experience and the prevalence of WMSDs in the top five regions (p > 0.05). There was a significant weak association between education level and the prevalence of upper back (V = 0.14, p = 0.049) and neck dysfunction (V = 0.16, p = .019). There was no significant association between therapists’ specialty and the prevalence of WMSDs (p > 0.05). There was a significant weak association between working facility and the prevalence of WMSDs in the neck (V = 0.178, p = 0.002) and upper back (V = 0.142, p = 0.020) (Table 5).

Table 5 Distribution of WRMDs by socio-demographic variables


The prevalence of WMSDs in Egyptian PTs was 99.5%, with the most prevalent anatomic locations being lower back (69.1%), neck (65.7%), shoulder (47.7%), wrist/hand (39.1%), and upper back (37%). Female PTs had a higher prevalence of WMSDs in all anatomic locations than male PTs, except for the upper back. Habitual faulty positions and heavy patients’ handling were the highest risk factor for WMSDs. Therapists mostly sought an informal assistance from fellow colleagues to treat the injury-related symptoms. Another common coping strategy was to modify working posture of the therapist and/or the patient. WMSDs in lower back, neck, shoulder, and wrist/hand were significantly associated with PTs’ education with a higher prevalence in therapists having a bachelor degree only. Also, therapists working simultaneously in public and private facilities showed the highest prevalence compared to those working in a single facility. WMSDs were not associated with therapists’ specialty or experience.

This study surveyed the prevalence of WMSDs among Egyptian PTs and common risk factors as well as the most adapted coping strategies. Questions adopted from Standardized Nordic questionnaire as well as from a study by Cromie et al. [14]. Several studies examined the prevalence of WMSDs among healthcare professionals using self-designed surveys based on questions adapted from previous studies. For example, Glover et al. [25] in 2005 estimated WMSDs prevalence in PTs working in UK using a survey adapted from that of Cromie et al. [14], West and Gardner [26], and Kuorinka et al. [34]. Also, Adegoke et al. [23] surveyed Nigerian PTs for WMSDs prevalence using a questionnaire adapted from that of Cromie et al. [14] and West and Gardner [26]. Further, Salik and Ozcan [15] and Vieira et al. [12] both investigated occupational injuries in Turkish PTs and American PTs, respectively, based their surveys on Cromie et al. [14].

The prevalence of WMSDs in this study is higher than that reported in similar studies conducted in Egypt (such as that of Melam et al. (63.9%) [28] and Khairy et al. (82.6%)) and worldwide (40–96%) [10, 16, 22, 23, 25, 26]. In this study, the top five affected regions were lower back, neck, shoulder, wrist, and hand as well as upper back. The prevalence of WMSD in those anatomic locations is in an agreement with previous research [28]. Previous studies conducted on Egyptian PTs reported the lower back, should, neck, upper back, wrist, and knee to be the most commonly injured regions [31], which is similar to the findings of the current study. The results of this study are also similar to that results of Salik and Oscan [15], although with a different order (lower back, hand-wrist, shoulders, and neck). The most prevalent regions registered by other studies were lower back, wrist/hand, neck, and shoulder [35], or lower back followed by wrists and hands [14], or lower back and neck [10, 23]. In Glover et al.’s survey [25], 69% PTs rated the spine as the most injured region and 5% rated the lower limbs as the least. A study conducted in Iran also reported similar findings to that of the current study with regards to prevalence of injury in the neck, shoulders, wrist, and upper back, although lower back region injury was not reported [22].

Lower back dysfunction was prevalent in 68.9% of the surveyed therapists, which is three times higher than that reported in a previous study in Egypt [28], yet within global ranges (26 to 69.8%) [14, 15, 22,23,24,25, 36, 37]. This is in an agreement with a another study conducted in Egypt that published a prevalence of 68.8% [31]. This prevalence is believed to be higher in countries with poor economy that have a high patient/therapists ratio and lack appropriate (ergonomic) equipment [23]. Manual techniques require PTs to repeatedly assume stressful postures (forward trunk flexion and rotation), reach forward, and exert forceful contraction of upper limb muscles. A recurrent mixture of forward flexion, lateral bending, and rotation can considerably load the spinal joints and cause pain [38]. As low back pain is associated with weaker core muscles and insufficient motor control [39,40,41,42], physically unfit therapists may get more predisposition to injury. Further, Egyptians have a high prevalence abdominal fat [43, 44] and hence higher body mass index (BMI), which is believed to be a jeopardizing factor for WMSDs [16]. Antigravity muscles show impaired activation with adiposity [45]. Thus, when core muscles are weak, lumbar vertebrae are at higher risk of injuries [39]. Yet, it should be emphasized that participants were not asked about their BMI; thus, this hypothesis cannot be confirmed.

The national prevalence of neck injuries in this study (65.1%) is almost double that reported in previous studies [28], yet it lies within published range (11.8–61.1%) worldwide [10, 15, 22, 23, 25, 26]. It is also much higher than the 36.7% prevalence reported in Khairy et al.’s study [31]. The shoulder dysfunction has a prevalence of 47% which is similar to the results issued in 2019 [31]. It is over two times greater than the 15.3% reported by Melam [28], although it is a slightly higher than the highest prevalence documented in literature (0.9–43.4%) [24, 46]. Neck and shoulder dysfunctions have been linked to occupational physical exposure such as repetitive manual handling, e.g., lifting, holding, and pushing; working in awkward or static postures; and working with arms above shoulder level [47]. Hand injury prevalence was 38.8% in this study vs. 29% and 14.5% in previous studies [28, 31] and within the internationally wide range that lies between 2.9 and 83% [24, 48]. The injuries in Iranian PTs were close to that reported in Egyptian PTs with a prevalence of 37.9% [22]. PTs use their hands constantly in applying manual tasks [49]. Repetitive forceful manual movements contribute considerably to WMSDs as they overload the musculatures of the upper limbs, particularly the small muscles of the wrist and hand. Prolonged repeated loading may result in overuse injuries of these structures and, even, central nervous system adaptation [50, 51].

The most rated symptoms in the current survey were pain (94.5%), heaviness (17.9%), stiffness (10.6%), weakness (29.4%), and fatigue (2.9%). This is in an agreement with the reported prevalence in Alrowayeh et al.’s study where pain was the most prevalent complaint in the studied anatomic regions (78.4–100%), followed by cramp/spasm (18.9–76.1%), and stiffness (12.5–53.6%) [20]. Due to the scarcity of reported symptoms of Egyptian PTs in literature, we could not compare the reported WMSDs symptoms results to other studies.

Respondents to this survey identified some factors that they believed relevant to sustaining WMSDs. Half of those factors were directly related to repeated and prolonged faulty utilization of mechanical postures while working such as assuming awkward positions as bending knees while flexing the back, prolonged stationary positions, inappropriate utilization of body mechanics, and repeated bending and twisting. Although Egyptian undergraduate physical therapy education offers several courses in biomechanics and ergonomics, yet respondents do not feel their training was sufficient to prevent injury in real world practice. Future research is recommended to investigate potential improvements in basic education curriculums to minimize the incidence of these injuries.

Previous studies reported WMSDs associated with working in uncomfortable or stationary positions such as prolonged and repeated bending and twisting to range between 10 and 64.6% [15, 23,24,25, 37]. In this study, the top work-related risk factors ranked by PTs were working in awkward body positions and dealing with heavy patients. Similarly, Khairy et al. [31] reported manual therapy, prolonged stationary positions, and fatigue to be the most common WMSDs risk factors reported by Egyptian PTs. Manual therapy has also been claimed to be a risk factor in Melam’s survey[28].

In this survey, more than 50.0% of the PTs who suffered WMSDs preferred to seek help of a fellow PT or to improve their body mechanics or to change patient’s position as coping mechanisms. This is also in an agreement with previously reported coping strategies, in addition to having work breaks between cases [31]. In Melam's study [28], the top strategies adapted by therapists included consulting physicians and taking sick leaves and relevant medications. Other PT population such as Turkish [15] reported the most common responses to be improving body mechanics, changing work position, and avoiding heavy lifting, whereas PTs of UK [25] tended to adjust the position of the patient or the plinth. Only 28.2% of our respondents employed the survivor bias by giving up the painful technique to less harmful one, which might be attributed to the limited work experience (1-5 years) of the majority of injured PTs in our sample. This percentage is greatly less than that reported by Cromie et al. [14], where 73.4% of PTs changed or modified their techniques due to injury. This was also true in previous reports in Egyptian [31] and Kuwaiti PTs [20]. This confirms a previous findings by Glover [25] who reported that injured PTs sought informal treatment by fellow PTs, rather than officially documenting injury. This raises a concern regarding the officially WMSDs reporting magnitude.

For gender association with WMSDS, our findings are in agreement with Glover et al. [25], Alrowayeh et al. [20], and Adegoke et al. [23], who reported that female therapists had significantly higher disorders than male PTs. This gender disparity of injury prevalence was attributed to higher psychological stresses in females, the influence of fluctuating female hormones, gender-specific difference in pain coping strategies, and the effect of familial factors that may change pain responses [52,53,54,55]. Further, Fredriksson et al. [56] reported that females were more likely to be injured with long-term mentally stressful work as well as the lack of sufficient leisure time. In Egypt, the culture increases the domestic task demands on women [57], which may add more physical stresses, and hence, increase their predisposition to musculoskeletal dysfunctions. It should be emphasized that Melam’s [28] and Khairy et al.’s [31] studies did not report regional gender-specific prevalence nor correlation.

Injury rate among junior PTs was previously reported to be much higher than among senior ones; particularly in the first 5 years of their career or under the age of 30 [13, 14]. Egyptian PTs’ years of experience did not show any significant correlation with WMSDs prevalence. However, most of the injured PTs in this study were those with 1 to 5 years of experience. This could be explained by junior PT working in more physically challenging positions [13], whereas seniors usually have more of their time allocated to administrative and managerial tasks than manual work [58]. Further, senior PTs are more competent in overcoming physically stressful situations by selecting alternative techniques based on their experience (known as the survivor bias) [14]. Khairy et al. [31] reported a higher prevalence in young Egyptian PTs of (29.9 ± 6.4) who are less experienced and probably need further training from their senior peers.

The higher the educational degree obtained by Egyptian PTs, the less likely they have neck and upper back problems, except for professional diploma. This may imply that basic educational training does not equip novice PTs with proper training to avoid injury. It should be emphasized that PTs with diploma were under sized in the current sample, and no solid conclusion could be generalized to this subpopulation.

Egyptian PTs who worked in private physiotherapy centers had a 54.8% prevalence of WMSDs in a precedent study [31]. In this study, working in two different types of facilities (public and private) simultaneously was associated with higher injury prevalence. Egypt economic burden drives most of PTs, especially younger therapists, to work in more than one facility simultaneously, subjecting them to long working hours, lack of rest, heavy caseload, and working with different equipment according to what is available at different settings. Darragh et al. [21] concluded that therapists who work in departments with heavy, hectic caseload such as acute care and outpatient rehabilitation sustain more WMSDs than those working in other less demanding settings. It should be emphasized that the correlation between injuries and professional experience, education, specialty, and work facility in Egyptian PTs was not investigated in previous work [28].

In this study, therapists who are general non-specialized practitioners had a higher prevalence of WMSDs. This contradicts with the findings that WMSDs affect different body parts according to specialty and tasks [10, 12, 16, 59]. The disagreement shown in our results could be attributed to practicing conditions in which therapists are required to deal with a higher caseload in less equipped facilities, regardless to their demographics.

This study investigated the prevalence of WMSDs in an adequate sample of Egyptian PTs. The results of this survey should be considered by Egyptian health and educational authorities to investigate potential preventive measures against WMSDs. Those preventive strategies should be carefully planned to decrease injuries especially of the top five anatomical areas commonly injured. Further, preventive strategies should be directed to reduce injury risk factors in females and novice PTs. These strategies may include adequate training especially on the proper work posture, ergonomic designing of work environment, and reasonable working hours and caseload.

However, a few limitations exist including (1) the sample was non-stratified, which under-presented some sub-groups such as therapists with professional diploma; (2) being an online survey limited available sample to therapist who can access the internet and who have computer skills, which may not be available in remote under-privileged areas; and (3) therapists self-reported WMSDs rather than had a confirmed diagnosis by a specialized healthcare professional. Future studies are encouraged to address these limitations and to consider prospective cohort studies with a stratified representative sample to estimate the incidence of WMSDs in Egyptian PTs. Further studies should incorporate a more qualitative approach to get more details of psychological and socioeconomical aspects of WMSDs.


WMSDs are prevalent in 99.5% of Egyptian PTs. The most five affected anatomic locations were the lower back, neck, shoulder, and wrist/hands and upper back. The most common risk factors were working in faulty positions or treating obese patients. The most common coping strategies were seeking the help of a peer therapist or changing work position. WMSD prevalence was associated with being a female therapist, having a bachelor degree, and working in more than one facility simultaneously. There was no evidence to support the association between experience or specialty and the prevalence of WMSDs.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials are available if needed.



Work-related musculoskeletal disorders


Physical therapists


  1. 1.

    da Costa BR, Vieira ER. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med. 2009;53(3):285-323.

  2. 2.

    Luttmann A et al. Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. Geneva: World Heal Organ Rep. 2003;(5):1-38lu.

  3. 3.

    Bernard BP, Putz-Anderson V, Susan Burt, Libby L, Cole ME, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back.; 1997. Accessed March 1, 2020.

  4. 4.

    Winkel J, Mathiassen SE. Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. Ergonomics. 1994;37(6):979–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hooftman WE, van der Beek AJ, Bongers PM, et al. Is there a gender difference in the effect of work-related physical and psychosocial risk factors on musculoskeletal symptoms and related sickness absence? Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(2):85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Devereux JJ, Vlachonikolis IG, Buckle PW. Epidemiological study to investigate potential interaction between physical and psychosocial factors at work that may increase the risk of symptoms of musculoskeletal disorder of the neck and upper limb. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59(4):269–77.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Girbig M, Freiberg A, Deckert S, et al. Work-related exposures and disorders among physical therapists: experiences and beliefs of professional representatives assessed using a qualitative approach. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2017:1–9.

  8. 8.

    Marcus M, Gerr F. Upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms among female office workers: associations with video display terminal use and occupational psychosocial stressors. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(2):161–70.<161::AID-AJIM6>3.0.CO;2-V.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Buckle PW, Jason DJ. The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(3):207–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Vieira ER, Svoboda S, Belniak A, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists: an online survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;00(00):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gropelli T, Corle K. Assessment of nurses’ and therapists’ occupational musculoskeletal injuries. Medsurg Nurs Off J Acad Medical-Surgical Nurses. 2011;20(6):297–303; quiz 304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Vieira ER, Schneider P, Guidera C, Gadotti IC, Brunt D. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists: a systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;1:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Glover W. Work-related strain injuries in physiotherapists: prevalence and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. Physiotherapy. 2002;88(6):364–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cromie JE, Robertson VJ, Best MO. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in physical therapists: prevalence, severity, risks, and responses. Phys Ther. 2000;80(4):336–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Salik Y, Ozcan A, Özcan A, Ozcan A, Özcan A. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a survey of physical therapists in Izmir-Turkey. Am J Ind Med. 2004;41(3):149–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nordin NAM, Leonard JH, Thye NC. Work-related injuries among physiotherapists in public hospitals: a Southeast Asian picture. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(3):373–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(1):13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Keyserling WM. Workplace risk factors and occupational musculoskeletal disorders, part 1: a review of biomechanical and psychophysical research on risk factors associated with low-back pain. Aihaj. 2000;61(March 2015):39–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stock S, Nicolakakis N, Raïq H, Messing K, Lippel K, Turcot A. Underreporting work absences for nontraumatic work-related musculoskeletal disorders to workers’ compensation: results of a 2007–2008 survey of the Québec working population. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):e94–e101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Alrowayeh HN, Alshatti TA, Aljadi SH, Fares M, Alshamire MM, Alwazan SS. Prevalence, characteristics, and impacts of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a survey among physical therapists in the State of Kuwait. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(1):116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Darragh AR, Huddleston W, King P. Work-related musculoskeletal injuries and disorders among occupational and physical therapists. Am J Occup Ther. 2009.

  22. 22.

    Rahimi F, Kazemi K, Zahednejad S, López-López D, Calvo-Lobo C. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Iranian physical therapists: a cross-sectional study. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2018;41(6):503–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Adegoke BOA, Akodu AK, Oyeyemi AL. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Nigerian physiotherapists. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9(1):112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ashfaq M;, Kanwal S, Tariq A. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists working in Rawalpindi/Islamabad. J Riphah Coll Rehabil Sci. 2013;1(2):6-11. = 1001173.

  25. 25.

    Glover W, McGregor A, Sullivan C, Hague J. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders affecting members of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2005;91(3):138–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    West DJ, Gardner D. Occupational injuries of physiotherapists in North and Central Queensland. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(3):179–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Anderson SP, Oakman J. Allied health professionals and work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Safety and health at work. 2016;7:259–67.

  28. 28.

    Melam GR. Work related musculoskeletal disorders: causes, prevalence and response among Egyptian and Saudi physical therapists. Middle-East J Sci Res. 2012;12(4):523–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Raoof NAA. Work related musculoskeletal disorder among Egyptian physiotherapists. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2014;19(1).

  30. 30.

    Atia DT, Abdelazeim FH, Radwan H. Impact of work-related musculoskeletal disorders on Egyptian pediatric physical therapists: one-year follow-up study. Trends Appl Sci Res. 2015;10(3):175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Khairy WA, Bekhet AH, Sayed B, Elmetwally SE, Elsayed AM, Jahan AM. Prevalence, profile, and response to work-related musculoskeletal disorders among egyptian physiotherapists. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(10):1692–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pretorius EJ, Spaull N. Exploring relationships between oral reading fluency and reading comprehension amongst English second language readers in South Africa. Read Writ. 2016;29(7):1449–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Akrouf QAS, Crawford JO, Al-Shatti AS, Kamel MI. Musculoskeletal disorders among bank office workers in Kuwait. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(1):94–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, et al. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987;18(3):233–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Campo M, Weiser S, Koenig KL, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in physical therapists: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):608–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hogan DAM, O’Sullivan LW, Nolan S, Greiner BA. Are Irish therapists at heightened risk for low back pain? Occup Med (Chic Ill). 2016;66(5):351–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Holder NL, Clark HA, DiBlasio JM, et al. Cause, prevalence, and response to occupational musculoskeletal injuries reported by physical therapists and physical therapist assistants. Phys Ther. 1999;79(7):642–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    McGill S. Low back disorders - evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation. Evid Based Prev Rehabil. 2007:19–25.

  39. 39.

    Chang W-D, Lin H-Y, Lai P-T. Core strength training for patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):619–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lee J-H, Hoshino Y, Nakamura K, Kariya Y, Saita K, Ito K. Trunk muscle weakness as a risk factor for low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(1):54–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mete E, Akduman V, Demirbuken I, et al. SAT0586 Relationship between core stabilization and low back pain in young people. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:997.

  42. 42.

    Rozenberg S. Chronic low back pain: definition and treatment. Rev Prat 2008;58(3):265-272. Accessed 18 May 2018.

  43. 43.

    Abo Lfotouh MA, Soliman LA, Mansour E, Farghaly M, El Dawaiaty A. Central obesity among adults in Egypt: prevalence and associated morbidity. East Mediterr Health J. 2008;14(1):57–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ibrahim MM, Elamragy AA, Girgis H, Nour MA. Cut off values of waist circumference &amp; associated cardiovascular risk in egyptians. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11(1):53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tomlinson DJ, Erskine RM, Morse CI, Winwood K, Onambélé-Pearson G. The impact of obesity on skeletal muscle strength and structure through adolescence to old age. Biogerontology. 2016;17(3):467–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas G, Wernstedt P, Campo M. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in female Swedish physical therapists with more than 15 years of job experience: Prevalence and associations with work exposures. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;27(3):213–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Mayer J, Kraus T, Ochsmann E. Longitudinal evidence for the association between work-related physical exposures and neck and/or shoulder complaints: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(6):587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wajon A, Ada L. Prevalence of thumb pain in physical therapists practicing spinal manipulative therapy. J Hand Ther. 2003;16(3):237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Porter SB. Tidy’s physiotherapy: fifteenth edition: Elsevier Inc.; 2013.

  50. 50.

    Barr AE, Barbe MF, Clark BD. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the hand and wrist: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and sensorimotor changes. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(10):610–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lamprecht A, Padayachy K. The epidemiology of work-related musculoskeletal injuries among chiropractors in the eThekwini municipality. Chiropr Man Ther. 2019;27(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hooftman WE, van Poppel MNM, van der Beek AJ, et al. Gender differences in the relations between work-related physical and psychosocial risk factors and musculoskeletal complaints. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30(4):261–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Leino-Arjas P. Men--the weaker sex? Unexpected results of a systematic review on work exposures and musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30(4):257–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Paller CJ, Campbell CM, Edwards RR, Dobs AS. Sex-based differences in pain perception and treatment. Pain Med. 2009;10(2):289–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rollman GB, Lautenbacher S. Sex differences in musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 2001;17(1):20-24. Accessed 14 Oct 2017.

  56. 56.

    Fredriksson K, Alfredsson L, Köster M, et al. Risk factors for neck and upper limb disorders: results from 24 years of follow up. Occup Environ Med 1999;56:59-66. Accessed 17 Oct 2017.

  57. 57.

    World Health Organization. Addressing the challenge of Women’s health in Africa | WHO | Regional Office for Africa. Accessed 29 Dec 2017.

  58. 58.

    Molumphy M, Unger B, Jensen GM, Lopopolo RB. Incidence of work-related low back pain in physical therapists. Phys Ther 1985;65(4):482-486. Accessed 1 June 2018.

  59. 59.

    Milhem M, Kalichman L, Ezra D, Alperovitch-Najenson D. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists: a comprehensive narrative review. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2016;29(5):735–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable



Author information




WA: conception of the research idea; design of the work; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; drafted the work; approved the submitted version; and have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. ARY: conception and refining of the research idea; design of the work; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; critically revised manuscript drafts; approved the final submitted version; and have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walaa Abu-Taleb.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved and conducted in accordance to the guidelines of the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt (P.T.REC/012/001699).

The questionnaire included an introduction to explain the study goals and survey structure as well as to obtain an informed consent from therapists willing to participate in the study to authorize the researchers to publish collected data.

Consent for publication

The questionnaire included an introduction that explained the goals of the study and survey’s structure. Moreover, it included a consent authorization by participants to enable the researchers to collect, analyze and publish collected data.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:.

Survey for Work- Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Egyptian Physical Therapists.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abu-Taleb, W., Rehan Youssef, A. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Egyptian physical therapists. Bull Fac Phys Ther 26, 7 (2021).

Download citation


  • Musculoskeletal disorders
  • Occupation
  • Physical therapy
  • Work-related disorders