Participants
The sample size of the current study was determined based on power analysis of pilot data. The effect of simultaneous application of positional release technique and Maitland mobilization technique was measured in four patients. An ANOVA was used to calculate the effect size. The calculated effect size (ES) was 0.4 for two independent variables and one dependent variable. With a power of 80% and an alpha value of 5% using F-test for all hypotheses, a priori compute required a sample size of 50 subjects (G*Power statistical software, version 3.03).
A randomized, controlled trial, with two parallel groups (experimental and control), was used to assess the effect of simultaneous application of positional release technique and Maitland mobilization technique on sensory NCV of sciatic nerve in patient with LBP associated with sciatica. Fifty-five patients diagnosed with LBP associated with sciatica were referred by a physical therapist at Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, outpatient clinic. Five patients were excluded from the study, two patients did not return after initial enrollment, and three patients were excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria. Therefore, data from fifty patients were considered for analysis (Fig. 1). To be included in the study, patients were to be diagnosed with chronic low back pain lasting more than 3–6 months associated with sciatica. Patients were excluded from the study if they had a surgery in the lumbar spine and a motor manifestation in the lower limb such as drop foot, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, previous history of tumor, and pregnancy. Patients were also excluded if they had an acute attack of LBP in the last 48 h or had undergone rehabilitation or exercise therapy in the previous 3 months. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups (experimental: group A and control: group B). To assure random assignment of the patients to either of the tested groups, patients were asked to select one of two folded papers (designated experimental or control) from a container. This study conforms to all consort guidelines and is registered in Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202009541417744).
Procedures
Participants in both groups were tested twice before and after a 6-week period, during which group A received a traditional physical therapy program along with positional release technique of the piriformis muscle and grade-4 Maitland mobilization technique. Group B received a traditional physical therapy program and a sham mobilization technique. Upon arrival, procedures were explained, and an informed consent, as approved by Cairo University’s Supreme Council of Postgraduate Studies and Research and Human Research Ethics Committee (P.T.REC/012/002962), was obtained. A medical history was collected from patients, and sciatic sensory NCV was performed. Following testing, group A and group B received the treatments described below, and then they were scheduled for a follow-up appointment in 6 weeks.
Outcome measures
Sensory NCV of sciatic nerve was measured to assess the integrity and function of the sciatic nerve before and after application of the treatment programs. The sensory NCV of sciatic nerve was collected at testing time points on day 1 and after 6 weeks by the same examiner. The examiner was blinded from the allocations process and the intervention programs. Measurements of sensory NCV of sciatic nerve were performed at the unit of electromyography (EMG) in the outpatient clinic at Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University.
Interventions
Patients in group A received a traditional physical therapy program and a combination of piriformis muscle positional release technique and grade-4 Maitland mobilization technique at L5-S1 level. The traditional physical therapy program involved application of hot pack and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 15 min followed by static abdominal exercises 3 sets of 15 repetitions and stretching of hamstring muscle 4 sets each set 30 s [7]. After that, the piriformis muscle positional release technique was performed. This technique was done to induce immediate relaxation of the piriformis muscle and enhance blood supply to nourish the muscle fibers efficiently by passively moving the muscle to a relaxed position and holding it for 90 s.
In piriformis muscle positional release technique, the patient was positioned prone on a stretcher. The therapist stood at the pelvis of the affected side. The patient’s leg was moved outside the bed with the hip and knee kept in a flexed position. The hip joint was then abducted and flexed until a comfortable position was achieved. After that, the leg was rested on a small chair beside the bed for 90 s (Fig. 2), and grade-4 Maitland mobilization was applied at L5-S1 level. This position puts the affected leg in a gravity-dependent position and relaxes the piriformis muscle which reduces the pressure on the sciatic nerve and increases its blood supply [8].
In grade-4 Maitland mobilization technique, the therapist first located L5-S1 by palpating both iliac crests and then moved medially to rest on the L4-L5 intervertebral disc. The therapist’s hands then moved further down to palpate L5 spinous process. The therapist placed the ulnar surface of the hand over L5 spinous process with the wrist in full extension, elbow slightly flexed, and the other hand placed on top of the hand to reinforce. The therapist then applied a posterior anterior force on L5 spinous process by leaning body over arms to provide a posterior anterior pressure (Fig. 3) and maintained it for 10–15 s [9]. The grade-4 Maitland mobilization was repeated five times. Patient was rested for 10 s, and then the whole technique was repeated ten times. The traditional physical therapy program, piriformis muscle positional release technique, and grade-4 Maitland mobilization technique were conducted three times per week for 6 weeks.
Patients in group B received the same traditional physical therapy program as group A as well as a sham positional release and a sham mobilization. During the sham positional release and sham mobilization, the patient was positioned prone on a stretcher, and the therapist stood at the pelvis of the affected side. The patient’s affected leg was rested on a chair with the knee and hip bent to control for the perform positional release technique. The therapist palpated the lower lumbar spine without applying any form of mobilization for 30 s and repeated this procedure three times. Patients in the group B received the same procedures three times per week for 6 weeks.
Data and statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 17 for windows. Initially, data were screened for normality assumption using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk normality tests. Additionally, data were screened for homogeneity of variance assumption. Once data were found not to violate the normality and homogeneity of variance assumptions, parametric analysis was conducted. Paired T-tests were conducted to compare the sensory NCV of sciatic nerve between the pre-test and post-test conditions in each of the tested groups. Unpaired T-tests were conducted to compare between group A and group B for sensory NCV of sciatic nerve in each of the pre-test and post-test conditions. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests.
